Subscribe to the Newspaper
View the Online Newspaper
Welcome
Search: Site   Web
I Think, Therefore I Blog ~ Life. People. Writing. Books. Internet. Politics (sometimes). Big Questions, Little Questions, Food.

Archive for the 'Religion' Category

Randall Terry, terrorist sympathizer and victim blamer

June 2nd, 2009, 10:52 am by fsherman

On the George Tiller murder in Kansas: “The whole point of this story should be, in part, what did George Tiller do that was so horrifying that it drove this man to that extremity?”

In other words, if someone murders an abortion doctor, don’t blame the people who say they deserve to die, blame the victim. Which is just a variation of the same argument terrorists and their supporters always use.

What Tiller did in some cases was save lives of women who were in life or death situation. Or abort babies who had horrifying, probably fatal birth defects.

Tell me, if right to lifers make it impossible for a woman whose pregnancy might kill her to get treatment–and there are only two doctors left in the country who do third-trimester abortions–wouldn’t that make them murder? By their own logic, wouldn’t I be justified in gunning them down to save lives?

I don’t think so, of course. And neither do they. But I think so because nobody has the right to go around handing out vigilante justice for people carrying out lawful acts; they don’t think so because they believe they and they alone are carrying out God’s will (they in this case being everyone who endorses violence as a solution to America allowing women control over their own bodies).

Obsidian Wings has multiple posts on this topic, all worth reading.

More slippery and slope

May 19th, 2009, 11:54 am by fsherman

There was a good article in the Daily News Saturday about how evangelicals deal with the torture question. Right wing, one time Republican presidential candidate Gary Bauer argued that “if we believe the person we have can give us information to stop thousands of Americans from being killed,” not using “harsh tactics” — Bauer claims he doesn’t count waterboarding as torture — would be “morally suspect.”

Several other interviewees express the view (paraphrased by the writer, Eric Gorski) that “if authorities believe a detainee” has information about an attack, if the detainee “might” have knowledge of an attack, it’s morally acceptable to use torture (for the record, several interviewees strongly opposed torture).

If we believe the prisoner knows something. If the prisoner might know something. Notice the fudging in there? It’s no longer the ticking bomb scenario where the prisoner is our one shot at saving lives; it’s a situation where the prisoner might know something, where the interrogator thinks he might know something … Using that standard, you could pretty much torture anyone at any time.

So the difference between Gary Bauer and the Inquisition would be …?

Freedom from religion–or it’s lack.

May 8th, 2009, 12:58 pm by fsherman

An article at First Amendment Center reports on a history teacher who told his students that creationism was “superstitious nonsense.” A judge ruled that by weighing in against religion, he’d violated the students’ First Amendment rights.

Update: In this Tennessee case, the judge ruled against the school covering up students’ posters promoting the National Day of Prayer.
Which I agree with: While apparently he wasn’t addressing the students as much as referring to a past creationism/evolution controversy, I still think he crossed the First Amendment just as much as if he’d called teaching evolution “atheist nonsense.”

A useful reminder that the system isn’t biased against religion, it’s biased in favor of freedom.

It’s not spiritual, it’s religious

April 27th, 2009, 9:21 am by fsherman

The First Amendment Center on a program which appears to be promoting kabbalism in schools, though it’s promoters argue that it’s teaching more general spiritual principles.

I’m inclined to agree with the article that while the line can be a fine one, this program falls on the wrong side of it.

Richard Tona speaks!

April 23rd, 2009, 10:21 am by fsherman

According to Wednesday’s Daily News, Tona has posted signs warning of the terrible cost of the Obama presidency: “Killing unwanted babies! $789 billion stimulus! Killing human embryos” and says in an intervie wthat “When you use taxpayer dollars to kill human beings, you take all hope away from a nation.”

Well, the death toll in Iraq has been 100,000 and that was paid for with our tax dollars. I compliment Tona on speaking out against that … oh, wait. He wasn’t. He’s not even objecting to the fact we’ve had a few soldiers commit murder .

Tona goes on to say he plans for a third sign that “President Obama says America is not a Christian nation.” Which is right, we’re not, just a nation with a lot of Christians in it. And Christians don’t get to make the rest of us live according to their beliefs, any more than Muslims or neo-pagans do.

Lies, damn lies and the religious right

April 23rd, 2009, 8:49 am by fsherman

Some rightwing blogs are all a-twitter over a judge in the Midwest supposedly declaring that while you can say “Allah” in prayers before government meetings, you can’t say the name of Jesus.
What the judge actually says is that sectarian prayers in government meetings are unconstitutional, regardless of who’s being invoked or in what religion. However, since there was no record in his jurisdiction of Muslims or Wiccans making such prayers “there is no need to be more specific in the injunction as to what would amount to a sectarian prayer in those traditions.”

It’s possible some groups are blurring this with a motion made in the Indiana statehouse afterwards that argued “Allah” means God and therefore is just as nonsectarian as saying “God” (this motion being separate from the court decision).

It’s also possible the religious right is having its usual freakout at the idea that equality means the government doesn’t get to favor Christianity over all other religions.

So if anyone brings it up, now you know. For more information, check out The Guardian

First off, may I say—

April 10th, 2009, 10:41 am by fsherman

That freedomblogging just rejiggered its interface again and I find it much more awkward to use. Though like the last change, it shouldn’t affect reading pleasure.

Now, as to the point of this post: John Stemberger, the religious conservative behind Florida’s no-gay-marriage amendment, is now proposing to hike marriage license fees in Florida by $100. To get it back, couples undergo a marriage counseling session from a qualified counselor; unsurprisingly, Stemberger thinks that should be faith-based counseling groups that mirror his views (living together before marriage bad!). If the couple declines counseling, the money would go as a grant to a similar approved group.

Pretty slick scheme. Stemberger also wants to eliminate or restrict no-fault divorce.

I’d agree with him that a lot of people marry to fast and divorce too fast. But even if this didn’t come across as a method of making people pay to finance one guy’s religious views, I think forcing it on people is wrong.

Bobby Jindal on why he wants creationism taught

February 26th, 2009, 1:49 pm by fsherman

“I personally think human life and the world we live in wasn’t created accidentally. I do think that there’s a creator. … Now the way that he did it, I’d certainly want my kids to be exposed to the very best science. I don’t want any facts or theories or explanations to be withheld from them because of political correctness.”

But what about an explanation without facts to support it? Like say, creationism/ID?

If Jindal wants his kids exposed to “the very best science” they should stay far away from creationism.

Also from Thursday’s Daily News

February 20th, 2009, 1:55 pm by fsherman

Pope Benedict has told Sen. Nancy Pelosi that she has a duty as a Catholic politician to protect the life of the unborn.

JFK’s comments 50 years ago is still pertinent: “I believe in an America that is officially neither Catholic, Protestant nor Jewish — where no public official either requests or accepts instructions on public policy from the Pope, the National Council of Churches or any other ecclesiastical source — where no religious body seeks to impose its will directly or indirectly upon the general populace or the public acts of its officials — and where religious liberty is so indivisible that an act against one church is treated as an act against all.”

Here we go again

February 11th, 2009, 10:25 am by fsherman

Jacksonville.com reports that Fla. State Sen. Stephen Wise has introduced a bill mandating the teaching of intelligent design alongside evolution because we should “teach both sides.”

Simply put, there’s only one scientific side: Evolution is the only theory out there that holds up. Creationism and intelligent design have been conclusively disproven and there is no reason to teach either except for the desire of some Christian groups to sneak their beliefs in schools (as courts have repeatedly ruled).

My favorite comment in the story, from Rep. Alan Hays (who proposed a failed anti-evolution bill in 2008: “The thing we learned last year is that, No. 1, we must keep the discussion scientific. I don’t know of anyone who is in favor of teaching religion in public … We want the students to know that the theory of evolution is only a theory, it has never ever been scientifically proven, and it should be accepted as that.”

ID is not scientific. And yes, if you support teaching ID in schools, that is teaching religion–specifically, the beginning of Genesis–in public schools.
Evolution has been scientifically proven. It’s called a “theory” because someday evidence might turn up that would disprove it—the same way that gravity, general relativity and quantum mechanics are theories—but at this point, it holds up. Creationism/ID don’t.

But I guess for Wise and Hays it’s a good deal: They’ll get lots of votes and support from the religious right, so why should they care that the state will have to shell out money for attorneys and court costs when the new rule (if it passes) is challenged on religious-freedom grounds?

ADVERTISEMENT 
ADVERTISEMENT 
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site